Somali Government Faces Intensifying Criticism as Presidential Term Nears End

 

Mogadishu, Somalia – August 20, 2025 – Somalia’s federal government, led by President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, is increasingly coming under fire as its four-year term approaches its final months. Allegations of human rights violations, forced evictions, and the misuse of state authority have drawn criticism from political figures, civil society, and ordinary citizens alike, raising serious concerns about governance, accountability, and social stability.

Former Prime Minister Hassan Ali Khaire, along with several former Somali presidents, have publicly accused the current administration of systematically oppressing citizens and prioritizing narrow political and financial interests over public welfare. Speaking at a press conference in Mogadishu on Tuesday, the former leaders detailed what they described as widespread abuse of power. They claimed that the government has engaged in illegal land acquisitions, forced displacement of vulnerable families, and the exploitation of state institutions to consolidate political advantage.

“These actions constitute a betrayal of public trust,” Khaire said, emphasizing that the government’s conduct undermines the rule of law and directly harms marginalized communities. “Instead of protecting the rights of the Somali people, the authorities are actively targeting those who are most vulnerable, leaving them without security, shelter, or support.”

According to the former officials, these practices are particularly concentrated in the capital, Mogadishu, where low-income families have reportedly faced repeated evictions without due process. Many residents have expressed frustration over what they perceive as systematic marginalization, highlighting the gap between the government’s promises and the lived realities of ordinary citizens.

Public sentiment appears to be growing increasingly volatile. Analysts warn that continued abuses could provoke mass unrest, particularly as tensions rise ahead of national elections scheduled for the coming months. The fear is that mounting dissatisfaction could escalate into protests or broader confrontations between citizens and state security forces, potentially destabilizing the capital and threatening the fragile political environment.

Civil society groups have echoed these concerns, calling for transparency, accountability, and immediate reforms to ensure that public resources and authority are not misused. “The government must demonstrate its commitment to justice and fairness,” said a local human rights advocate. “Failing to address these grievances risks eroding public trust and destabilizing the nation at a critical time.”

Despite the mounting criticism, Somalia’s federal government has not issued an official response to the allegations. Observers note that the administration’s silence may exacerbate tensions and fuel speculation regarding the government’s intentions and priorities.

As Somalia approaches a pivotal election period, the spotlight on governance, accountability, and human rights is likely to intensify. How the government responds to these accusations could significantly influence the country’s political trajectory and the stability of Mogadishu, where citizens continue to voice their frustrations over inequities and insecurity.

In the coming weeks, Somali leaders, civil society, and international observers will be closely monitoring the situation. The resolution—or escalation—of these issues may shape the nation’s democratic processes and the public’s confidence in their leaders for years to come.